¶1Gordon, Weinberg & Gordon, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
¶2David H. Anderson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Wm. M. Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
¶3Before BARNES, ELY, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
¶5This is an appeal from a denial of Sertic’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus to review the Air Force’s determination that Sertie did not qualify for discharge as a conscientious objector because his beliefs were based solely on a personal moral code. The District Court concluded that there was a basis in fact for the Air Force’s determination.
¶6Nothing in the record before the District Court supplied a basis in fact for the Air Force’s denial of Sertic’s claim. Both the Air Force and the District Court concluded that Sertie was sincere in the beliefs which he entertained. Those beliefs 1 fell directly within the test of Unit*916ed States v. Seeger (1965) 380 U.S. 163, 85 S.Ct. 850, 13 L.Ed.2d 733, accordingly, reversal is compelled. (E. g., United States v. Haughton (9th Cir. 1969) 413 F.2d 736; United States ex rel. Brooks v. Clifford (4th Cir. 1969) 409 F.2d 700; Bates v. Commander, First Coast Guard District (1st Cir. 1969) 413 F.2d 475; Fleming v. United States (10th Cir. 1965) 344 F.2d 912.)
¶7The order is reversed, and the District Court is directed to grant the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
¶8The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.