In Re Sujeet Kumar Hariklia Dris Reitz Xiangxin Bi and Nobuyuki Kambe’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2025
4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Dickinson v. Zurko · In re Gartside · Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. LKB Produkter AB
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“factual questions relating to the scope and content of the prior art, the differences between the prior art and the claimed invention, the level of ordinary skill in the art, and any relevant secondary considerations such as commercial success, long-felt need, and the failure of others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hyatt v. Iancu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.