Bostic’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably 626 F. Supp. 2d 195 - Brodeur v. Claremont School District (2009), 501 F. Supp. 2d 695 - Chancellor v. Pottsgrove School District (2007)
5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis, As Next Friend of Lashonda D. v. Monroe County Board of Education et al. · Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools · Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District · Smith v. Borough of Wilkinsburg · Rosa H. v. San Elizario Independent School District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n 'appropriate person' is 'an official who at a minimum has authority to address the alleged discrimination and to institute corrective measures on the ... [district's] behalf.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'Actual notice' must amount to 'actual knowledge of discrimination in the recipient's programs.' " Bostic , 418 F.3d at 360 (quoting Gebser v. Lago Vista Indep. Sch. Dist. , 524 U.S. 274 , 290, 118 S.Ct. 1989 , 141 L.Ed.2d 277 (1998) ). To place a school on "actual notice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] school principal who is entrusted with the responsibility and authority normally associated with that position will ordinarily be 'an appropriate person' under Title IX.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.