Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 F.3d 379 - Pec Solutions Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Pec H

Pec Solutions Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Pec H’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
March 2023
most recently cited

6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably In re Bearingpoint, Inc. Securities Litigation (2006), Iron Workers Local 16 Pension Fund v. Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. (2006)

6 district ·

230200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Edwards v. City of Goldsboro · In re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation · Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Matkari

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “|T]o show loss causation, a securities-fraud plaintiff must demonstrate that the 'defendant's misrepresentation was a substantial cause of the loss by showing a direct or proximate relationship between the loss and the misrepresentation.” ') (quoting Miller v. Asensio & Co., 364 F.3d 223, 232 (4th Cir.2004)); Semerenko v. Cendant Corp., 223 F.3d 165, 185 (3d Cir.2000) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A statement or omission is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable purchaser or seller of a security (1) would consider the fact important in deciding whether to buy or sell the security or (2) would have viewed the total mix of information made available to be significantly altered by disclosure of the fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[l]eave to amend need not be given when amendment would be futile,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.