Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 F.3d 444 - In Re: Yokamon Laneal Hearn

In Re: Yokamon Laneal Hearn’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Reyes-Requena v. United States · Bennett v. United States · Ex Parte Briseno · In re Morris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the State of Texas, through its highest criminal court, has decided to use [the PMRA] statutory definition of 'mental retardation' in Atkins proceedings, it would be a ‘no brainer’ that the statutory definition of who is qualified to opine as to mental retardation would also apply”). . 135 S.W.3d at 8 (noting that the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) his claim has not previously been presented in a prior application to this court, (2) his claim relies on a decision that stated a new, retroactively applicable rule of constitutional law that was previously unavailable to him, and (3) ... he is mentally retarded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Mental retardation is a disability characterized by three criteria: significant limitation in intellectual functioning, significant limitation in adaptive behavior and functioning, and onset of these limitations before the age of 18.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.