Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 F.3d 575 - United States v. Baldwin

United States v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

418 F.3d 575 · 2005

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably United States v. Lopez-Medina (2006), United States v. White (2007)

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

160200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Sokolow · Mitchell Warden v. Esparza · United States v. Barnett · Dale Oney v. Darrell Ratliff Jungle Rags Inc Walt Disney Company Walt Disney Consumer Products Walt Disney World Company the Disney Store Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the present case, Baldwin was sentenced to 55 months of imprisonment, which is in the lower half of the Sentencing Guidelines range of 51 to 63 months. The government presented no evidence to rebut the presumption that this sentence was prejudicial to Baldwin.... We therefore hold that the district court committed plain error in sentencing Baldwin under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.