Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

418 F. Supp. 1073

Docket Civ. A. No. 74-C-623.

Leipzig v. Pallamolla

Vernon P. LEIPZIG, Jr. and Verlyn Randall, Plaintiffs, v. Ruth PALLAMOLLA et al., Defendants.

U.S. District Court

Decided August 31, 1976.

U.S. District Court · decided 1976-08-31

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1978

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Redhail v. Zablocki

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-08-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Terry W. Rose, Kenosha, Wis., for plaintiffs.

¶2Joseph Salituro, Corp. Counsel, Kenosha, Wis., for defendant.

¶3Ward L. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Madison, Wis., for Atty. Gen. of the State of Wis. and of counsel, for defendant.

¶4Before TONE, Circuit Judge, and REYNOLDS and WARREN, District Judges.

¶5

ORDER

¶6This is an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging the constitutionality of a Wisconsin statute, § 245.10 (1973), which requires certain Wisconsin residents to obtain court permission before they can marry. In a companion case decided this day, Redhail v. Zablocki,418 F.Supp. 1061 (E.D. Wis.), we held § 245.10(1), (4), and (5) unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. There we defined the plaintiff class as follows:

"All Wisconsin residents who have minor issue not in their custody and who are under an obligation to support such minor *1074 issue by any court order or judgment and to whom the county clerk has refused to issue a marriage license without a court order, pursuant to § 245.10(1), Wis.Stats. (1971)."

¶7Because plaintiffs in this action fit the above description and are entitled to relief as members of the plaintiff's class in Redhail, this individual action is hereby dismissed as moot.

/418/fsupp/1073 · .json · Public domain