418 F. Supp. 2d 875 - Thunderhorse v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1301 (§ 201 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968) · 25 U.S.C. § 1303 (§ 203 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968) · 25 U.S.C. § 1802 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Parratt v. Taylor · Hudson v. Palmer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.