Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 Md. 37 - State v. Shim

State v. Shim’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Myers · Casey v. Roman Catholic Archbishop · Corens v. State · Dingle v. State · Gunning v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Does any member of the panel hold such strong feelings regarding violations of the narcotics laws that it would be difficult for you to fairly and impartially weigh the facts of this trial where narcotics violations have been alleged?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To hold differently ... would make voir dire an exercise in semantics and a minefield for criminal defendants and the State. We decline to make such fine distinctions or create more uncertainty. A proposed voir dire question need not be in perfect form, and the court is free to modify the proposed question as needed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Does any member of the jury panel have such strong feelings concerning the violent death of another human being that you would be unable to render a fair and impartial verdict based solely on the evidence presented?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.