Harrod v. Baggett’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1995
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Tulsa v. Harman · 28 Ga. App. 335 - Hendricks v. Jones · Beatty v. Dixon · Pruitt v. Timme · Jackson v. Land
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the duty to keep [the] premises reasonably safe for invitees applies only to defects or conditions which are in the nature of hidden dangers, traps, snares, pitfalls, and the like, in that [they] are not known to the invitee and would not be observed by him in the exercise of ordinary care.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nicholson v. Tacker“would not be observed by [the invitee] in the exercise of ordinary care,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.