Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 P3D 1278 - State v. Riffe

State v. Riffe’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Solem v. Helm · Harmelin v. Michigan · Jones v. Bock · Trop v. Dulles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But the meaning of a law—a statute or a constitutional provision—cannot change until the text of that law changes. . . . '[O]ur constitution is deemed to mean what the words imply to a person's common understanding.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[H]umility—attendant as it is to the indeterminacy of language and the difficulties of the interpretive process—must be considered a third, equally important leg of the originalist stool.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “If the issue was not raised below, there must be an explanation why the issue is properly before the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.