Prevost v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2021
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Washoe County v. Otto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the agency and all parties of record to the administrative proceedine as respondents in a petition for judicial review of an administrative proceeding. We uphold Otto's ruling that NRS 233B.130(2)(a)'s requirements are”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that the statute is satisfied, sufficient to confer jurisdiction, when the relevant party is simply mentioned somewhere in the petition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[T]he caption is not determinative as to the identity of the parties to the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.