Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 Pa. Super. 23 - Commonwealth v. Cull

418 Pa. Super. 23 - Commonwealth v. Cull’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · Bourjaily v. United States · Dutton v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because we wouldn't give her no drugs and she threatened to call the cops.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “we just shot this fiend in the head and left her in the basement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “I shot the bitch because she scratched me in my face.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.