Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

418 S.C. 398

In re Bell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 18, 2016

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2016-11-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2019

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-11-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

¶3*399IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

¶4Respondent is hereby enjoined from taking any action regarding any trust, escrow, operating, and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain at any bank or other financial institution, including, but not limited to, making any withdrawal or transfer, or writing any check or other instrument on the account(s).

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.
/418/sc/398 · .json · Public domain