418 So. 2d 1020 - Auld v. Holly’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2003
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 40 Cal. App. 3d 623 - Matchett v. Superior Court · Dade County Med. Ass'n v. Hlis · 297 So. 2d 861 - Jones v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RD. CO. · 100 Ill. App. 3d 1029 - Mennes v. South Chicago Community Hospital · 370 So. 2d 1174 - Good Samaritan Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. v. Simon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“formed to evaluate and improve the quality of health care.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“efforts could later be used in medical malpractice cases.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Somer v. Johnson · Somer v. Johnson“At the outset, we must decide whether a hospital's credentials committee is a "medical review committee" as defined by the statute. A credentials committee is a medical review committee so long as the purpose of the committee is one of those listed in the statute. It is apparent that at least one of the purposes of the credentials committee in the present case is to improve the quality of health care at the hospital by limiting staff privileges to doctors of a certain caliber of competence. Therefore, we conclude that the credentials committee is a medical review committee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.