Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 SO2D 1050 - Reeves v. Miller

Reeves v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2679

Relies on 252 So. 2d 229 - Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. · 415 So. 2d 47 - State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Chapman · Wilson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Insurance provided to comply with a statutory requirement must comply with the statute. A policy purporting to provide the required statutory coverage but containing exclusions not contemplated by the statute does not provide the required coverage. Since the unauthorized exclusions are contrary to public policy as established by the statute, they are deemed inapplicable and disregarded and the policy is enforced as if it were in express compliance with the statutory requirements. See, e.g., Mullis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 252 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1971); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Chapman, 415 So.2d 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Andriakos v. Cavanaugh, 350 So.2d 561 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)." 418 So.2d 1050 -1051.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any obligation for which the United States may be liable under the federal tort claims act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.