Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 SO2D 1344 - State v. Sharp

State v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Narcisse (1983), 445 So. 2d 1184 - State v. Jarman (1984)

47 state decisions

3101982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Brawner · 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · State v. Roy · 408 So. 2d 1229 - State v. Dupre · State v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the present case, the evidence (particularly the medical evidence) was in substantial conflict, and there was ample evidence to support either verdict the jury decided to render. When there is conflicting evidence on the issue of insanity at the time of the offense, the reviewing court should accord great weight to the jury’s resolution of the conflicting evidence (as long as the jury was properly instructed and no evidence was prejudicially admitted or excluded), and the jury’s verdict should not be overturned unless no rational juror could have found, on the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, that defendant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence his insanity at the time of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “thoroughly convinced that the remarks influenced the jury and contributed to the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.