Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 So. 2d 203 - Eldridge v. State

418 So. 2d 203 - Eldridge v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2018

17 state decisions

701982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Spinelli v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Rabinowitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “So long as a statute does not wrest from courts the final discretion to impose sentence, it does not infringe upon the constitutional division of responsibilities.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Indigent offenders would be advantaged over other offenders if they were not subject to fines because of their inability to pay. Wheatt v. State, 410 So.2d 479 (Ala.Cr.App.1982); Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 , 91 S.Ct. 668 , 28 L.Ed.2d 130 (1971).'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"While this court may rule a fine or sentence excessive, the separation of powers doctrine forces this court not to substitute its own judgment for that of the legislature unless those constitutional guarantees of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution or of Article I, § 15, 1901, Alabama Constitution are clearly violated. Cabble v. State , 347 So.2d 546 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 347 So.2d 551 (Ala. 1977)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.