Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 So. 2d 212 - Stevens v. State

418 So. 2d 212 - Stevens v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2006

7 state decisions

30198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Strunk v. United States · United States v. Palmer · 340 So. 2d 840 - Lucy v. State · Ex Parte Lucy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““DID APPELLANT’S CONVICTIONS VIOLATE HIS RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHERE HIS TRIAL ATTORNEY OMITTED FROM THE RECORD ON APPEAL APPELLANT’S UNAMBIGUOUS ASSERTION OF HIS RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL?””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Stevens v. State · Stevens v. State
  2. ““The Supreme Court observed that no single factor was determinative. ‘Rather, they are related factors and must be considered together with such other circumstances as may be relevant. In sum, these factors have no talismanic qualities; courts must still engage in a difficult and sensitive balancing process.’ 407 U.S. at 533 [ 92 S.Ct. at 2193 ].” 418 So.2d at 213 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Stevens v. State
  3. “Although we recognize that it was not the appellant's responsibility to bring his cases to trial, the failure to assert his right at an earlier time tends to indicate that if any prejudice existed it was minimal. See U.S. v. Palmer, 537 F.2d 1287 (5th Cir.1976).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 893 So. 2d 488 - Snyder v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.