418 So. 2d 345 - Dunn v. Stack’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2017
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 412 So. 2d 461 - Swartz v. Swartz · 410 So. 2d 501 - Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. · Sapp v. Warner · 351 So. 2d 29 - Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · 397 So. 2d 775 - Nationwide Mut. Ins. v. Ed Soules Const. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Constructive notice is a legal inference, and it is imputed to creditors and subsequent purchasers by virtue of any document filed in the grantor/grantee index--the official records.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“from the fact that the person had a means of knowledge, which it was his duty to use and which he did not use”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“confusing and appear[ing] to provide factual conflicts,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stack v. Dunn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.