Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 So. 2d 411 - State v. White

418 So. 2d 411 - State v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · McCray v. State of Illinois · Michigan v. Ohio · 179 So. 2d 873 - Spataro v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The State shall forthwith provide to Fred Tromberg, Esquire, attorney for Jamie L. Henshaw the name and address of the confidential informant. 2. The State shall further forthwith provide counsel with the documents sought in the second paragraph of the claimant’s Request to Produce. 3. Fred Tromberg, Esquire is under continuing Court Order not to divulge the name or identity of the said confidential informant to any person, including Jamie L. Henshaw, under penalty of contempt of this Court. 4. Counsel for the parties shall cooperate in scheduling the deposition of the confidential informant, and the Court Reporter shall not divulge the name or identity of said person to anyone, under penalty of contempt of this Court. 5. The transcribed deposition shall be sealed, placed in the Court file, and only opened upon Court Order. 6. The only individuals permitted to attend the deposition of the confidential informant shall be respective counsel for the parties, the witness and the Court Reporter. 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(2) Informants. Disclosure of a confidential informant shall not be required unless the confidential informant is to be produced at a hearing or trial, or a failure to disclose his identity will infringe the constitutional rights of the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.