418 So. 2d 967 - Andersen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2004
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dunn v. State · 414 So. 2d 993 - Ex Parte Allen · Barbee v. State · 410 So. 2d 449 - Craig v. State · 408 So. 2d 173 - Beasley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(p)romises performance which the defendant does not intend to perform or knows will not be performed. Failure to perform, standing alone, however, is not proof that the defendant did not intend to perform.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“"(2) Knowingly obtains by deception control over the property of another, with intent to deprive the owner of his property. (Acts 1977, No. 607, p. 812, § 3201.)"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The import of § 13A-8-2 is to proscribe all similar conduct motivated by similar intent which has similar results. The focus of this new ‘theft’ statute is on the intent of the perpetrator (thief) to deprive the owner of his property. The legislature’s objective was to remove the distinctions in the old theft statutes based on the manner of obtaining control and, thereby, shed the old classifications of ‘larceny’, ‘embezzlement’, etc., which allowed those guilty of one type of theft to escape punishment when the evidence proved a different type. See Commentary to § 13A-8-2 through § 13A-8-5, Code of Alabama 1975.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.