418 So. 2d 984 - Simpson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably 448 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Rhoden (1984), 573 So. 2d 284 - Holton v. State (1991)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. Hale · Clark v. State · Bennett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e should seek to avoid, not foster a hypertechnical application of the law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]here clearly a timely objection to the improper comment was made by defense counsel, and where the judge unequivocally and without hesitation overruled the objections, the issue of the admission of such testimony and comments before the jury is properly preserved for appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The prosecutor may not, therefore, use at trial the fact that he stood mute or claimed his privilege in the face of accusation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.