Ex Parte Meadows’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 1990 · most notably Ex Parte Bagley (1974), Hathorne v. State (1970)
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bennett v. State · Ex Parte Gudel · Ex Parte Cooper · Brotherton v. State · 70 Tex. Crim. 349 - Burden v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Insofar as they hold or appear to hold that the failure of court appointed counsel, or said counsel and the accused, to waive in writing the 10 days allowed appointed counsel to prepare for trial is ground to set aside an otherwise valid conviction by habeas corpus, or other post conviction or collateral attack, Ex parte Austin, Tex.Cr.App., 410 S.W.2d 439 ; Ex parte Dowden, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 512 ; Ex parte Brown, Tex.Cr.App., 404 S.W.2d 590 ; and Ex parte Cooper, Tex.Cr.App., 388 S.W.2d 939 , are overruled.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jacobs v. State · Marin v. State““It does not follow that the failure of appointed counsel to waive in writing the 10 days allowed him to prepare for trial is sufficient grounds for post conviction relief, if'it appears that such failure did not result in injury to the defendant such as would deprive him of a fair trial or deny him a constitutional right. “There are many statutes the violation of which, if properly raised, would be ground for a new trial or reversal on appeal but would not be ground for relief in a post conviction proceeding.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.