Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 S.W.2d 89 - Slivka v. Hackley

Slivka v. Hackley’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2006

13 state decisions

7019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · Pennoyer v. Neff · 22 Ill. 2d 432 - Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. · 11 Ill. 2d 378 - Nelson v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Our review of the authorities need not commence with Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714 , 24 L.Ed. 565 , which emphasized the traditional aspects of physical jurisdiction over the parties. Rather, it commences with the now celebrated case of International Shoe Company v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 66 S.Ct. 154 , 90 L.Ed. 95 . * * * [I]t is clear that in this day and age a person, natural or artificial, may subject himself to the jurisdiction of a court even though a capias ad respondendum may not coerce his physical presence in the forum * * * A defendant over whom jurisdiction is asserted must have had such ‘minimum contacts’ with the state as to render it consistent with ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ that he be compelled to defend himself and to respond to any adverse judgment rendered against him.” Id. at 91 9”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.