Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 SW3D 437 - In re Forck

In re Forck’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Coleman · In Re Harris · In Re Ehler · In Re Stewart · In re Kazanas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a failure of a lawyer to heed a substantial risk that circumstances exist or that a result will follow, which failure is a deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable lawyer would exercise in that situation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a conscious awareness of the nature or attendant circumstances of the conduct but without the conscious objective or purpose to accomplish a result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the ultimate sanction imposed should at least be consistent with the sanction for the most serious instance of misconduct among the violations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.