Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 U.S. 656 - United States v. Connecticut National Bank

United States v. Connecticut National Bank’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

199
cited by 199 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 36 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 199 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably United States v. Nixon (1974), Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. (1992)

50 federal appellate · 36 district · 2 state decisions

69019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Philadelphia National Bank · United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc. · United States v. Continental Can Co. · United States v. Von's Grocery Co. · United States v. Pabst Brewing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 199 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the 'area of effective competition in the known line of commerce must be charted by careful selection of the market area in which the seller operates, and to which the purchaser can practicably turn for supplies.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “effect in any section of the country may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly, or which in any other manner would be in restraint of trade,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “At some stage in the development of savings banks, it will be unrealistic to distinguish them from commercial banks for purposes of the Clayton Act. [Tjhat point may well be reached when and if savings banks become significant participants in the marketing of bank services to commercial enterprises.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.