Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

419 B.R. 20

In Re Roberts

Sixth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel · decided 2009-11-09

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2012

Relies on Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In Re Roberts)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-11-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

In re John E. ROBERTS, Judy K. Roberts, Debtors.
Clyde Hardesty, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
Citifinancial, Inc., Appellee.
In re Honor Friesner, Debtor.
William Todd Drown, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
Citifinancial, Inc., Appellee.

Bankruptcy Nos. 09-8020, 09-8021.

¶1United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit.

Argued: November 4, 2009.
Decided and Filed: November 9, 2009.

¶2ARGUED: William Todd Drown, Folland & Drown LPA, Mount Vernon, Ohio, for Appellants. Amelia A. Bower, Plunkett Cooney, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: William Todd Drown, Folland & Drown LPA, Mount Vernon, Ohio, for Appellants. Amelia A. Bower, Plunkett Cooney, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.

¶3*21 Before: FULTON, HARRIS, and RHODES, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

¶4

OPINION

¶5RHODES, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge.

¶6After reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, and after considering their oral arguments, the Panel determines that the bankruptcy court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and its conclusions of law are correct. We therefore affirm the bankruptcy court's decision for the reasons stated by that court in its well-written opinion entered in Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts),402 B.R. 808 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2009), and incorporated in In re Friesner.

/419/br/20 · .json · Public domain