Pauley v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
419 F.2d 1061 · 1969
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 1983 · most notably Egger v. Phillips (1983), Doe v. Hampton (1977)
21 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 7501 (Civil Service Due Process Amendments)
Relies on United States v. Carmack · Keim v. United States · Kletschka v. Driver · Eberlein v. United States · Norton v. Macy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t seems indisputable[ ] that 'strained personal relations' between an employee and his co-workers 'would appear to provide a permissible basis for a transfer ....'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This part applies to removals, suspensions, furloughs without pay, and reduction in rank or pay of employees of the Government of the United States and the government of the District of Columbia. § 752.102 Definitions. * * * * He § 752.103 General exclusions. ***** § 752.104 General standards. (a) An agency may not take an adverse action against an employee covered by this part except for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service. Among the reasons that constitute ‘such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service’ for this purpose are the reasons for disqualification of an applicant listed in § 731.201(b)-(g) of this title. Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi § 752.105 Agency records. “Each agency shall make a part of its records, copies of the notice of proposed adverse action, the material relied on by the agency to support the reasons in that notice, any answer made by the employee, the notice of any agency hearing on the proposed adverse action and the report thereof, and the notice of decision. Subpart B — Removal. Suspension for More Than 30 Days, Furlough Without Pay, and Reduction in Rank or Pay. § 752.201 Coverage. (a) Employees covered. This subpart applies to: (1) (i) Any career, Hs Hs Hi Hi Hs (b) Adverse actions covered. This sub-part applies to: (1) Removal Hs Hi Hi Hi Hi § 752.202 Procedures. “(a) Notice of proposed adverse action. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, an employee against whom adverse action is sought is entitled to at leas”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““We have carefully examined the administrative record and are convinced that no unreasonable delay occurred and the delay that existed was not prejudicial to plaintiff. This assertion of prejudicial delay is without merit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.