Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 F.2d 1112 - Schy v. Susquehanna Corp.

Schy v. Susquehanna Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

419 F.2d 1112 · 1970

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
7
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 29 Cal. 3d 462 - Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc. (1981), Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau (1982)

36 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

39019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on J. I. Case Co. v. Borak · Hansberry v. Lee · American Federation of Musicians v. Carroll · A. Maschmeijer v. Eastern Motor Express, Inc. · Swanson v. American Consumer Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The plaintiff next complains that the district court erroneously considered affidavits and exhibits filed on the day of the hearing in violation of rule 6(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff did not complain of untimeliness in the trial court, although he did urge the court not to consider the exhibits as evidence. Since the plaintiff did not complain about the late filing in the trial court, he cannot do so on appeal.” Id. at 1116.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““There must be both the injuria and the damnum to give a legal cause of action, and this remains true notwithstanding the legal fiction of nominal damages. Indeed, this truth made the legal fiction logically necessary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This court should deny [PEC's] Motion for Summary Judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.