Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 F.2d 1203 - Thomas v. United States

Thomas v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

419 F.2d 1203 · 1969

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2000 · most notably United States v. Springfield (1987), United States v. Lesina (1987)

21 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

22019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Dixon · United States v. Barbour · Story v. United States · People v. Asan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[U]nder the law an accidental killing may be second degree murder, manslaughter, or no crime at all, depending on the degree of recklessness involved. (Footnote omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “receive[s] no guidance on the issue from the trial court,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a one-sided view of the evidence is obviously improper”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.