Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

419 F.2d 126

Docket No. 17799.

Stuart v. Pinto

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted on Briefs Oct. 20, 1969. Decided Dec. 3, 1969.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-12-03

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1974

6 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1969-12-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Richard J. Stuart, pro se.

Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Atty. Gen., Trenton, N.J., for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This is an action under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 1981 et seq.) brought by appellant against the Superintendent of the New Jersey State Prison at Rahway, New Jersey. The district court, in an opinion presently unreported, dismissed the action.

¶2

The complaint in substance deals with certain prison regulations and conduct by prison officials in general terms inadequate to establish a right to relief.

¶3

We therefore will affirm the dismissal of the complaint.

/419/f2d/126 · .json · Public domain