Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 F.2d 160 - Smith v. Rhay

Smith v. Rhay’s Empirical Analysis

419 F.2d 160 · 1969

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
11
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably United States v. Pheaster (1976), United States v. Crawford (2004)

46 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 11 states

280196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Townsend v. Sain · Escobedo v. Illinois · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not purporting to have grounds for arrest,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although [the suspect] was told that he had the right to an attorney, he was not ... told, as required by Miranda , that he had the right to the presence of an attorney....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We think it obvious ... that a parole officer may not conduct a warrantless search of items in the parolee's possession while acting on the prior request of law enforcement officials and in concert with them. The parole officer is in such a case acting[ ] not as the supervising guardian ... of the parolee[ ] but as the agent of the very authority upon whom the requirement for a search warrant is constitutionally imposed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.