United States v. Grimsley’s Empirical Analysis
419 F.2d 387 · 1969
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1995
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Houma Well Service · Huth v. Southern Pacific Co. · United States v. Fiorito · 2 Ga. App. 383 - Hines v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This young man seated over here between you and I writes down everything that I say concerning every rule and if the occasion should present itself, then the injured party would have an opportunity to have — and if it is necessary because of the nature of the verdict — some other court at some other time could review my rulings as to whether or not they were correct or not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Comments which tend to shift the jury's responsibility to another tribunal are inappropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.