Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

419 F.2d 759

Docket No. 23548

Harold A. Spriggs v. Jerry v. Wilson

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 14, 1969. Decided Oct. 16, 1969.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-10-16

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1974

12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Wade · Gilbert v. California · United States v. Allen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1969-10-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Norman Lefstein, with whom Mr. Joseph Paull, Washington, D.C., was on the motion, for appellant.

Mr. Donald S. Smith, Asst. U.S. Atty. for appellees. Messrs. Thomas A. Flannery, U.S. Atty., and John A. Terry and Mrs. Ellen Lee Park, Asst. U.S. Attys., also entered appearances for appellees.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT and McGOWAN, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The motion for stay is denied. In so doing, we deem it appropriate to state, as we suggested in United States v. Allen, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 84, 408 F.2d 1287 (1969), that on this record we see no reason, and the Government at oral argument has offered none beyond an unsubstantiated reference to convenience, why the right to effective assistance of counsel does not require that the description of the suspect as given to the police be made available to counsel for the appellant at the lineup. See United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967). See also A.L.I. Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure, Study Draft No. 1, page 32 (April 1968). We, of course, do not intend to indicate any opinion on the merits of the other issues raised on this appeal.

¶2

Motion denied.

/419/f2d/759 · .json · Public domain