Ali v. Cangemi’s Empirical Analysis
419 F.3d 722 · 2005
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Lankford v. Sherman (2006), Maldonado v. Lynch (2015)
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Powell v. McCormack · United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Spencer v. Kemna · Zadvydas v. Davis · Clark Field Office Director Seattle Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al. v. Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If an issue is moot in the Article III sense, we have no discretion and must dismiss [it] for lack of jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Article III of the United States Constitution limits the jurisdiction of the federal courts to actual, ongoing cases and controversies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.