Pulver v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Townsend v. Sain · Stone v. Powell · Larry Fletcher v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, James Fletcher v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida · Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Donald M. Painten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In sum, we hold only that a federal court need not apply the exclusionary rule on habeas review of a Fourth Amendment claim absent a showing that the state prisoner was denied an opportunity for a full and fair litigation of that claim at trial and on direct review.” 428 U.S. at 495, n. 37 , 96 S.Ct. at 3053, n. 37 (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chavis v. Henderson“Even if this Court were to hold that petitioner’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the police officers’ conduct, the writ could not be granted unless petitioner was also denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claims in the state courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pulver v. Cunningham“opportunity for full and fair litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.