United States v. Vilus’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 20 U.S.C. § 1071 · 20 U.S.C. § 1087A · 20 U.S.C. § 1091A · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Mead Corp. · Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air · Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. of Phila. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. · New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he DOE chose the cost-averaging method because the Secretary of Education has determined that tracking costs of collection of each defaulted loan would create too onerous of a system, that such a level of specificity would be untenable, inefficient, and that such detailed record keeping would result in far higher collection costs for debtors than percentage-based collection costs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Sprolito
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.