419 F. Supp. 2d 597 - Keane v. Chertoff’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 8 U.S.C. § 1104 (§ 104 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (§ 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Heckler v. Chaney · Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Heckler v. Ringer · Bowen v. Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ahmed v. Cissna“The action that the plaintiff seeks to compel must be subject to positive command, plainly described, and free from doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ahmed v. Cissna“falls within the scope of both the INA and federal regulations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.