Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 MASS 341 - Commonwealth v. Pinckney

Commonwealth v. Pinckney’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Commonwealth v. Wilson (1998), Commonwealth v. Gunter (1998)

45 state decisions

230199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Estelle v. McGuire · Holland v. United States · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Victor v. Nebraska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “here has the signification of settled and fixed, a conviction which may follow a careful examination and comparison of the whole evidence.' ... As used in this instruction, ... we are satisfied that the reference to moral certainty, in conjunction with the abiding conviction language, 'impress[ed] upon the factfinder the need to reach a subjective state of near certitude of the guilt of the accused.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean proof beyond all doubt, nor beyond a whimsical or a fanciful doubt, nor proof beyond the possibility of innocence. 45 "It is rarely, if ever possible, to find a case so clear that there cannot be a possibility of innocence. If an unreasonable doubt or a mere possibility of innocence were sufficient to prevent a conviction, practically every criminal would be set free to prey upon the community. Such a rule would be wholly impracticable and would break down the forces of law and order, and make the lawless supreme. 46 "A reasonable doubt does not mean such doubt as may exist in the mind of a man who is earnestly seeking for doubts or for an excuse to acquit a defendant; but it means such doubt as remains in the mind of a reasonable man who is earnestly seeking the truth. 47 "A fact is proved beyond a reasonable doubt when it is proved to a moral certainty, as distinguished from an absolute or mathematical certainty; when it is proved to a degree of certainty that satisfies the judgment and consciences of the jury as reasonable men, and leaves in their minds, as reasonable men, a clear and settled conviction of guilt. But if when all is said and done there remains in the minds of the jury any reasonable doubt of the existence of any fact which is essential to the guilt of the defendant on the particular charge, the defendant must have the benefit of it and cannot be found guilty upon that charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean proof beyond all doubt, nor beyond a whimsical or a fanciful doubt, nor proof beyond the possibility of innocence. 45”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.