Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 Md. 560 - McDaniel v. Baranowski

McDaniel v. Baranowski’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

4 district · 22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Golt v. Phillips · Citaramanis v. Hallowell · Southern Management Corp. v. Taha · Harry Berenter, Inc. v. Berman · Siu Leung Shum v. Gaudreau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Licensure under local ordinances in order to operate rental dwelling units is an integral part of a landlord’s status as claimant in those jurisdictions that require licensure. As a result, in order to invoke the facile process of summary ejectment, a landlord in those jurisdictions requiring licensure, must affirmatively plead and demonstrate that he is licensed at the time of the filing of the complaint for summary ejectment in order to initiate the summary ejectment process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A person may not engage in any unfair or deceptive trade practice ... in: (1) The sale, lease, rental, loan, or bailment of any consumer goods, consumer realty, or consumer services; (2) The offer for sale, lease, rental, loan, or bailment of consumer goods, consumer realty, or consumer services; (3) The extension of consumer credit; or (4) The collection of consumer debts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]f a statute requiring a license for conducting a trade, business or profession is regulatory in nature for the protection of the public, rather than merely to raise revenue, an unlicensed person will not be given the assistance of the courts in enforcing contracts within the provisions of the regulatory statute because such enforcement is against public policy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.