Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 N.W.2d 369 - Gipson v. State

Gipson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Toumberlin v. Haas · Metier v. Cooper Transport Co., Inc. · Schmitt v. Clayton County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he duty of the [public agency] is of a general nature, involving an exercise of due care under the circumstances.... While engineering knowledge and skills may well be utilized by the [public agency] in fulfilling its obligation, the ... obligation is stated in broader terms. Compliance with recognized or, in the case of the manual, statutorily mandated engineering procedures would be most relevant to whether [the public agency] has properly discharged its function. [Its] duty is not necessarily coterminous with [an] engineer’s professional judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he engineering determinations which are required to implement the manual are not dispositive of the legal liability of the public agency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.