Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 P3D 184 - Sayedzada v. State

Sayedzada v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Smith v. Phillips · Ross v. Oklahoma · Dennis v. United States · Tinsley v. Borg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a state of mind that prevents the juror from being impartial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a party waives the right to challenge a juror's presence on the jury on appeal where the party's appellate argument is based on facts known to the party during voir dire; the party consciously elected not to pursue, 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER or abandoned, a challenge for cause on that basis; and the party accepted the juror's presence on the jury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “where the juror discloses some fact that bespeaks a risk of partiality sufficiently significant to warrant granting the trial judge discretion to excuse the juror for cause, but not so great as to make mandatory a presumption of bias.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.