Sayedzada v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2025
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Smith v. Phillips · Ross v. Oklahoma · Dennis v. United States · Tinsley v. Borg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a state of mind that prevents the juror from being impartial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a party waives the right to challenge a juror's presence on the jury on appeal where the party's appellate argument is based on facts known to the party during voir dire; the party consciously elected not to pursue, 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER or abandoned, a challenge for cause on that basis; and the party accepted the juror's presence on the jury”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grewer“where the juror discloses some fact that bespeaks a risk of partiality sufficiently significant to warrant granting the trial judge discretion to excuse the juror for cause, but not so great as to make mandatory a presumption of bias.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.