State v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
November 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · State v. Dunbar · State v. Weston · State v. Mitchell · United States v. Cohen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 803(3), SCRE, provides that a statement ‘of the declar-ant’s then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, and bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed’ is not excluded by the hearsay rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Daise
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.