Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 So. 2d 333 - State v. Dodd

419 So. 2d 333 - State v. Dodd’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
4
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably 434 So. 2d 321 - State v. Lavazzoli (1983), 524 So. 2d 988 - Bernie v. State (1988)

32 state decisions

2801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Weeks v. United States · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Grubbs v. State · 394 So. 2d 1150 - Kirkland Masonry, Inc. v. Lorey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ARTICLE I DECLARATION OF RIGHTS Section 12. Searches and seizures — The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and against the unreasonable interception of private communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized, the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence to be obtained. This right shall be construed in conformity with the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. Articles or information obtained in violation of this right shall not be admissible in evidence if such articles or information would be inadmissible under decisions of the United States Supreme Court construing the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a creature of judicial decisional policy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A person's status as a probationer may be taken into consideration in determining whether a search or seizure is unreasonable for constitutional purposes, but in Grubbs this Court unequivocally repudiated the notion that the article I, section 12 exclusionary rule may simply be ignored at a probation revocation hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.