Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 SO2D 340 - Grabow v. Grabow

Grabow v. Grabow’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1990
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Firestone v. Firestone · 383 So. 2d 700 - Turner v. Turner · 204 So. 2d 21 - Goodman v. Goodman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “12. That, while it is clear that there has been a substantial and meaningful change in the financial circumstances of both parties since the execution of the Agreement and the entry of the Final Judgment, HARRY’S income and ability to pay having increased dramatically and SUSAN’S needs having also greatly increased, the Agreement is silent in respect to a Modification in the event of change of circumstances. Accordingly, it is presumed that the parties contemplated such contingencies when they provided for additional support geared to HARRY’S increased income. Thus, SUSAN’S Motion for Modification must be denied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.