Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 So. 2d 862 - State v. Lefevre

419 So. 2d 862 - State v. Lefevre’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2008 · most notably State v. Green (1995), 750 So. 2d 916 - State v. Thibodeaux (1999)

32 state decisions

170198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 345 So. 2d 1129 - State v. Bennett · State v. Hall · 343 So. 2d 118 - State v. Glover · State v. Goins · 339 So. 2d 788 - State v. Marmillion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The law is clear that when the issue on appeal is whether an accused's level of intellectual disability precludes him from effectively understanding the essential nature of his rights to silence and counsel and of the consequences of his speech, much weight is accorded to the trial court's assessment. State v. Coleman, 395 So.2d 704 (La.1981); State v. Trudell, supra ; State v. White, 329 So.2d 738 (La.1976). Once the trial judge has determined that the state has met its burden of proof, his decision is entitled to great weight on review. State v. Coleman, supra ; State v. White, supra ; State v. Hall, 257 La. 253 , 242 So.2d 239 (1970)."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Opinions of experts on the question of `waiver' of constitutional rights may be helpful but are not binding on the trial court. The decision on the validity of a waiver is ultimately for the court. There is no controlling psychiatric principle. State v. Coleman, supra. See also State v. Bennett, 345 So.2d 1129 (La.1977)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.