Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 419 SO2D 951 - State v. Quimby

State v. Quimby’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

120
cited by 120 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

120 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith (1983), 433 So. 2d 73 - State v. Neslo (1983)

120 state decisions

4601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 66 Cal. 2d 808 - People v. Varnum · 411 So. 2d 415 - State v. Vaccaro · 405 So. 2d 829 - State v. Rogers · 395 So. 2d 1337 - State v. Motton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In providing a wide range of criminal sanctions (punishment) for violations of a statute, the legislature obviously intends that the [trial] judge shall exercise his sentencing discretion to impose sentences graded according to the individualized circumstances of the offense and of the offender.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Upon motion of the defendant, the court shall order the district attorney to inform the defendant of the existence, but not the contents, of any oral confession or statement of any nature, made by the defendant, which the district attorney intends to offer in evidence at the trial, with the information as to when, where and to whom such oral confession or statement was made.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"If the state intends to introduce a confession or inculpatory statement in evidence, it shall so advise the defendant in writing prior to beginning the state's opening statement. If it fails to do so a confession or inculpatory statement shall not be admissible in evidence."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.