Carpenter v. Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2006
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pittman v. Lilly · 360 So. 2d 645 - Broday v. Broday · 301 So. 2d 906 - Smith v. UTILITY & MAINTENANCE CON. OF AMER., INC. · Rice v. Kliebert · 320 So. 2d 331 - Stahlman Lumber Co.-Div. of Staco Mfg. Co. v. Ferrill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“]2A judgment dissolving a writ of attachment has been held to be an appealable interlocutory judgment. Pittman v. Lilly, 197 La. 233 , 1 So.2d 88 (1941) and cases cited therein. However, an order denying a motion to dissolve a writ of attachment cannot be appealed prior to a disposition on the merits of the ease. There is an exception to the basic rule stated above. If the motion to dissolve the attachment is accompanied by an incidental demand for damages for wrongful issuance of the writ, then even an order denying the motion is appealable. Stahlman Lumber Co. v. Ferrill, 320 So.2d 331 (La. App. 3rd Cir.1975), Smith v. Utility and Maintenance Contractors of America, Inc., 301 So.2d 906 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1974).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.