Head v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2005
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Platt v. State · 146 Tex. Crim. 568 - Goodale v. State · Gage v. State · Gooden v. State · 166 Tex. Crim. 470 - Mayo v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The fact that the 1958 conviction was used to enhance his punishment as a second offender under Art. 62, V.A.P.C. does not . . . preclude its subsequent use in fixing his status herein as a third offender (habitual criminal). . ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pearson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.